The Depopulation Agenda - Part 2

Creating a food scarcity

In this second of a 4 part series on the elite’s desire to depopulate the planet, I will examine how the elite are deliberately trying to cause food scarcity.

An edited version of this article originally appeared on The Conservative Woman website in March this year.

The Depopulation Agenda – Part 2

Creating food scarcity

Henry Kissinger, one of the most influential politicians of the last 50 years, famous for saying, “the elderly are useless eaters,” considered the idea of using food to control the population. In his 1974, “National Security Study Memorandum 200,” he outlined a number of countries of strategic importance for the US that he claimed had problems with population growth that might give them more economic, and military strength. He advocated birth control programmes for those countries and suggested that if they did not do this willingly, withdrawing food aid to them may act as an incentive to make them comply –

“Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can't/won't control their population growth?”

Using food as a weapon, though, is not just an idea. It has been put into practice before. Russia did it in Turkestan in 1917, where they took control of food production and distribution, resulting in starvation and a drastic reduction in the indigenous population. The USA and Canadian governments also implemented it by slaughtering the buffalo population to starve the indigenous people into submission so they would give up their land to settlers.

Now, there is a concern among many including economists, Wall Street veterans and citizens groups  that controlling the food supply is once more being implemented to control and reduce the population.

It is claimed by powerful groups like the UK’s Climate Change Committee and the International Panel on Climate Change, and the governments they influence, that the main factor exacerbating the so-called ‘climate crisis’ is co2. In reality, co2 is essential to all life. If co2 levels are drastically reduced, plant life, that requires co2 for photosynthesis, will inevitably be reduced and therefore the whole food chain will be adversely affected. In fact ,a recent report claims that pursuing net zero could lead to half the world suffering from starvation.

Is this why every government in the world is so intent on achieving net zero?

In addition to the fake ‘climate crisis’ we now have the fake ‘nitrogen crisis.’ Nitrogen is one of the main elements of commercial fertilisers and is an essential nutrient for plant growth but at excessive amounts can be a pollutant and, according to the climate crisis zealots, can cause global warming. The EU’s, Integrated Nutrient Action Plan aims to reduce nitrogen fertiliser by 20%. The UN want to reduce all nitrogen ‘waste’ by 50% by 2030.

Some of the people targeted by the plan to reduce fertiliser usage are the Dutch farmers. The tyrannical government in the Netherlands plans to compulsorily purchase up to 3000 farms in order to reduce nitrogen emissions and to cut cattle by 50%. As the Netherlands is the biggest food exporter in Europe it won’t just affect the Dutch but have a devastating impact on the food supply in the rest of Europe.

But, is there actually a nitrogen crisis?  Just like the so-called climate crisis, the evidence is ambiguous at best but the statistics are manipulated by those in power to suit their own ends.? It’s not as if they aren’t aware of the consequences of drastically reducing the use of commercial fertiliser, they only have to look at Sri Lanka.  Food prices rose by 80% and there were massive shortages resulting in thousands of desperate people laying siege to the president’s palace and the president having to flee the country.

So, analysing current events, is it all just due to a set of unrelated circumstances that there appears to be a threat to the availability and cost of our food, or is there something more disturbing going on?

In this respect, it may be worth noting that as farmland is being forcibly sequestered from farmers, Bill Gates is now the single biggest owner of farmland in the USA. As the elite are trying to reduce meat consumption, Bill Gates has investments in synthetic meat? As the USA suffered severe baby formula shortages, Bill gates had invested in artificially produced breast milk. It would certainly appear that the elite are determined to monopolise and therefore control the food supply.

Other events would tend to indicate a planned assault on the food supply. In the US, since 2021, 96 facilities involved in food production have either been damaged or had their poultry or livestock destroyed. Numerous websites are suggesting this is a deliberate attempt to cause food shortages.

The destruction of food processing plants is not limited to the US, however. In the UK fires have broken out at facilities in Ealing, Gillingham, Bury St Edmunds, Bradford, Stoke-on-Trent, Harlow and Kilkeel, Northern Ireland. In fact, it appears to be a global phenomenon.

In addition to this, we have the UK and other governments deliberately ordering the slaughtering of millions of poultry due to alleged outbreaks of bird flu. Supposedly there have been 174 outbreaks of bird flu in the UK since October 2022 but how are these cases confirmed? They are diagnosed using PCR tests that we know from the covid era are totally unreliable and, according to their inventor, should not be used for diagnostic purposes. On the subject of covid, the world’s government’s imposed lockdowns also had a negative and totally foreseeable impact on the food supply chains.

Recently, UK supermarkets suffered from shortages of an ever-expanding list of fresh fruit and vegetables. The media initially tried blaming it solely on adverse weather in Spain and Morocco from where we import the produce.  However, other reports have suggested it is also because UK farmers, who grow their produce in greenhouses, can’t afford to heat them because of the high cost of fuel. It’s interesting, therefore, that the government  has been giving famers lump sum payments to leave farming altogether and to give up their land so it can no longer be used for agricultural purposes – thereby reducing the amount of land available for food production - when they could have been offering more financial help to farmers and food producers to increase our food security.

We must also ask why the energy costs are so high to begin with. Contrary to the mainstream media blaming it and everything else on the war in Ukraine it is because of our obsession with net zero and our government’s own policies. We have been drastically reducing our coal production and planning to close all coal-fired electricity plants by October 2024, and no longer encouraging any investment in fossil fuels. Instead, we are relying evermore on the totally unreliable renewables sector.

Our coal production dropped by 44% between the third quarter of 2021 and the third quarter of 2022 but our imports increased by 34%. So, the government are deliberately reducing our own coal supplies to reach net zero targets whilst importing more to make up the shortfall, making a mockery of their environmental claims whilst ensuring the British public pay more for their energy. For the same period, gas exports increased by 369% so, why wasn’t this used domestically instead to reduce the soaring energy bills everyone, included, food producers, faced last year?  Moreover, our electricity exports increased by 771% and yet we were being warned of potential blackouts and electricity bills for both businesses and households were exorbitant.

The cost of energy is inextricably linked to the price of food as high energy costs for the farmers and transporters equals high food prices and now, shortages. At this point it is worth highlighting another quote form Henry Kissinger –

“Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world.”

The question must be, are all these events that are negatively impacting the food supply being orchestrated? Perhaps a recent paper published by Leeds University may be enlightening. It is entitled, “Rationing and Climate Change Mitigation.”

In it, the authors suggest that rationing of both food and fuel would be helpful to prevent climate change. They praise how successful rationing was during the war and believe it would be a great idea to re-introduce it. They admit, however, that the public are unlikely to go along with this idea if they think resources are plentiful.

“A skeptic might challenge our arguments, arguing, ‘the evidence from the two world wars might show that people are willing to accept rationing, when this was a response to scarcity, but they will not accept rationing when there is an abundance of resources available.”

So, what do the authors suggest? If there is no actual scarcity of resources then the    illusion of scarcity of something else must be created and, that, they claim are carbon sinks. There are not enough of them, apparently. So, we won’t be permitted to use all our resources, not because they are not plentiful, but because our planet cannot absorb the carbon produced by humans utilising them.

The authors realise that the public will need to be re-educated to believe in this fake scarcity–

“Rationing in this context may require a public information campaign to help people to recognize the scarcity of carbon sinks, to make it clear that we would not be introducing rationing-in-the-face-of-abundance.”

And they will also need to make us feel guilty.

“Second, this may also need to be supported by moral argument – highlighting the moral imperative to consider future generations or at least the current younger generations.”

It sounds suspiciously like the behavioural psychology from the covid era. This time, though, instead of making us believe that that covid was going to kill everyone and we must comply in case we kill granny, they want us to believe that carbon dioxide will kill everyone and if we don’t comply, we will kill young people.

Of course, their plan would be made a lot easier if the government actually created a real scarcity in the first place, which is what they go on to suggest. They want the government to close all coal mines, stop all oil exploration and severely restrict any sale of fossil fuels. They admit that this will cause scarcity and it will be a problem initially –

“Given that these policies would result in scarcity, this might still be hard to sell.”

To overcome this, they suggest the government resort to the usual propaganda about saving the lives of future generations and eventually the gullible public will buy it. Then rationing could be implemented -

 “While regulation created the scarcity, rationing would manage the scarcity – and, as we have argued, rationing has proved its effectiveness in managing scarcity.”

They also advocate deliberately creating food shortages –

“In addition to stricter regulations on fossil fuels, regulation could also target other areas. For example, carbon-intensive farming methods and factory-farmed livestock could be banned – which would clearly have impacts on food supplies.”

Does this not sound more like our current reality than a mere suggestion for the future?

In Part 3 we will examine how vaccines are causing fertility issues.